Version française


? | Home page | Tutorial | Mixing in practice | Mastering

Homepage
Home page


MASTERING

Reminder: we work on this song I wrote: Life


(mp3 file)

Quick definition

We should say "pre-mastering" instead of "Mastering", but everyone says "Mastering", so I'll do the same.

Theoretically, the mastering is the process that results in a "Master", which is the final version of a recording before it's transfered to a physical medium (vinyl, cassette, CD, etc.), while controlling that all established norms are respected for the type of medium. Therefore, it's the last creative process as well as the last purely technical process of a recording.

But most of the time, when someone speaks about mastering, it's merely the last creative step of a musical work, the one that comes right after mixing and before broadcasting it to the public, whether that public be yourself and your family, or millions of people!

On this page

Before anything else... | What do I need? | Multiband compressor | Limiter | Conclusion

Top of page

Before anything else...

Before you start mastering anything, make sure you follow these rules:

- The mix must be completed. Don't start the mastering process unless you are happy with your mixing and there is nothing more to do in that area. Because mixing is the art of polishing each instrument individually to get a consistent whole, while mastering is the art of polishing a whole tune as a single entity. You don't deal with various parts anymore, you deal with the whole mix altogether. Which implies it must be finished.

- In order to be objective once the mix is over, I advise you to wait one day or two before starting the mastering. As the hearing memory is rather short, you will rediscover your work with a fresh ear if you wait that long.

- During the mastering process, it's better to work with studio monitors rather than with a headset, even more so than for the mix. But as always, it's better to work with a very good pair of headphones than with mediocre monitors. If you work with headphones, be aware that your perception of stereo sounds, as well as the balance of lows and highs are different with headphones. But if you know your headphones well, if you use reference songs that you know as well, you will be able to fix any possible mistakes by yourself.

- In professional studios, the mastering engineer is not the same as the mixing engineer. That gives him a fresh and neutral look over the song. Mastering monitors are also particularly accurate and placed in a well-studied room, sound-wise.
In a home studio, you will most probably mix and master yourself, with the same monitors and/or headphones (and not necessarily the best ones), in an untreated room of your appartment or house, with daily life sounds around you (cars in the street, noisy neighbors, family members in the next room...). And you're going to have to deal with it!

Top of page

What do I need?

Not much, actually, but here are the essentials, sufficient for most home-studio owners:
- A multiband compressor
- A limiter

As an option, you may also use the following gear/plugins:
- An equalizer. If your mix is good, you probably don't need to balance frequencies when mastering, but a few (very few!) corrections might be necessary here and there.
- A reference song. To help you reach your goal, keep a song you like within reach (use a song in the same style as the song you're working on, don't refer to Mozart if you're mastering a Death Metal song...). Your aim will be to obtain a sound similar to that song.

Other tools may help you give your song the atmosphere you're looking for:
- Stereo enhancement plugins
- Spectrum analyser plugins that will analyse your song and compare it to your reference song
- Plugins that will let you know about the dynamics of the song, so you don't get a sound that is too compressed and crushed. Like TT Dynamic Range Meter available on this page.

Personally, I only use a multiband compressor and a limiter. The first one helps me to highlight some frequency ranges to shape and enhance the sound. The difference with and without a multiband compressor is staggering.
The limiter will boost the perceived sound volume and make the song more energetic. But don't overdo it or you might lose some dynamics and make your song too aggressive and tiring to listen to.

Top of page

MULTIBAND COMPRESSOR

To be clear, on the Master bus, the bus towards which all other main buses converge (guitars, bass, vocals, synths, drums), I put a multiband compressor plugin on top.

Mise à part cette caractéristique, cela reste un compresseur, avec les réglages suivants :

A multiband compressor will apply different compression settings on frequency ranges defined by the user. For example, you may want to compress a lot the low frequencies, leave the mediums untouched, and slightly compresse the highs.

- Threshold: defines the level from which the compressor starts reacting.

- Ratio: defines the compression level you want to apply, from 1 (no compression) to infinite (in this case, the compressor becomes a limiter).

- Attack: defines the speed at which the compression reacts once the threshold is reached.

- Release: defines the speed at which the compressor stops reacting once the volume level goes back below the threshold.

- Knee: defines whether the compression starts reacting precisely when the threshold is reached, or starts reacting gradually when the volume level comes close to the threshold.

- Gain: the more the sound is compressed, the lower the volume gets. To compensate for the volume loss due to compression, use the gain.

Multidynamics (the multiband compressor plugin that I use) has two gain knobs; lo-gain and hi-gain. Lo-gain is the gain that is applied to the sound signal when it is below the threshold, whereas hi-gain is the gain applied to the signal when it is above the threshold. The ratio determines the transition from one to the other.

To use Multidynamics like a compressor, lo-gain must be higher than hi-gain, which will reduce the signal gain when it gets over the threshold. If you do the opposite (hi-gain higher than lo-gain), the compressor becomes an expander, that is to say the opposite of a compressor. For now, we are looking forward to using the plugin as a compressor and not as an expander.

- Output: the overall output volume.
The Wave Arts multiband compressor Multidynamics can use from 3 to 6 bands. Here, I defined 4 frequency ranges (bands):
- From 0 to 50 Hz, for infra-basses
- From 50 to 175 Hz, for lows
- From 175 Hz to 2 KHz, for mediums
- From 2 to 20 KHz, for highs.

Why these specific frequencies? Because after various trials, I found this was the best setting for this song. Nothing magical about it. Trials, errors, more trials...

Settings used for the first frequency band (from 0 to 50 Hz):
- Lo-gain: 0 dB
- Threshold: -24 dB
- Hi-gain: -5 dB
- Ratio: 2
- Attack: 35 ms
- Release: 40 ms

Settings used for the second frequency band (from 50 to 175 Hz):
- Lo-gain: 6 dB
- Threshold: -21 dB
- Hi-gain: -8 dB
- Ratio: 2
- Attack: 16 ms
- Release: 25 ms

Settings used for the third frequency band (from 175 Hz to 2 KHz):
- Lo-gain: 3 dB
- Threshold: -21 dB
- Hi-gain: -6 dB
- Ratio: 2
- Attack: 5 ms
- Release: 10 ms

Settings used for the fourth frequency band (from 2 to 20 KHz):
- Lo-gain: 6 dB
- Threshold: -18 dB
- Hi-gain: -8 dB
- Ratio: 2
- Attack: 5 ms
- Release: 10 ms

Common settings for all bands:
- Knee: Medium
- Crossover slope: 30 dB/octave (behavior of transitions between frequency ranges)
- Lookahead: 5 ms (used to analyse sound peaks that can occur during play)
- Mode: Vintage

Here is the Master bus sound without any plugin:


(mp3 file)

Then the sound obtained with the multiband compressor Multidynamics:


(mp3 file)

Obviously, the multiband compressor allows for a much better sound clarity and all instruments find their place. Everything seems to breathe better, the sound is less confined, more open. Just better!

Wave Arts Multidynamics
Wave Arts Multidynamics is a commercial plugin. You may replace it with a free alternative plugin like 5orcery from Platinum Ears Plugins, a free 5 band compressor.

Download 5orcery
(5orcery.zip, 2.09 MB)

The zip file contains the PDF user manual, as well as a preset file named "5orcery_master.fxp". This is the preset I use for the song Life, and corresponds to the screenshot below.


With a free plugin...

I obtained a very similar result using the free multiband compressor 5orcery from Platinum Ears Plugins. Simpler than multidynamics, it offers all the settings you need. You get 5 frequency bands, you can manually choose the frequency that separates two bands, and each band has threshold, fain, attack and release knobs. The peak detection is achieved by selecting an RMS level for each band (RMS is an average level, similar to what the human ear can perceive), or the peaks (Pk). You can also activate or deactivate each band separately if you don't want to use all of them. You can adjust the Input signal, and you will find a Saturation knob, which does not add saturation, but is made to attenuate unexpected peaks. Finally, you have an overall Output level knob.

Using the settings shown on the screeshot above, I obtain a result pretty close to what I get with Multidynamics. It's a bit less accurate, a bit less defined, but it's definitely close.

Here is the sound I get with the multiband compressor 5orcery:


(mp3 file)
Platinum Ears Plugins - 5orcery
Platinum Ears Plugins - 5orcery
Top of page

LIMITER

We are one step away from the final result, and we are going to use a limiter. This is a tool that will boost the volume of a song, by raising up the volume from a defined threshold, up to a ceiling level you define manually. This is a great tool, but it can be damaging to the song. If you set a threshold too low, the sound is altered, it can become very aggressive, because the sound dynamics is crushed and everything will sound loud all the time. So, be gentle with it. With modern music (such as Dance or many Electronic musics), you can compress the signal much more than you would with musics that should have more constrast, where volume variations are desired and benefit the song, making it lively.

For the song Life, with the multiband compressor activated, the average RMS level is rather low, around -15 dB, with a dynamic range between -12 and -14 dB for the most part. This means we have quite a lot of margin, the dynamics is rather large, and we will be able to apply much compression without damaging the song, in order to raise the average level while maintaining good dynamics.

This is the dynamics we have before applying the limiter, measured with the plugin TT Dynamic Range Meter:
TT Dynamic Range Meter
In the top center, you can see the dynamic range at the moment the screenshot was made while playing the song (14.3 dB). At the bottom left and bottom right, you can see the average RMS level of the left and right channels (-16.3 dB and -15.6 dB).

Once the limiter is activated, we still have a dynamic margin between 9 and 11 dB. For your information, the album Nevermind by Nirvana, released in 1991, had a dynamic range of about 12 dB, as well as the album Wish You Were Here by Pink Floyd, released in 1975. The Fame Monster from Lady Gaga, released in 2009 has a dynamic range of 5 dB. Way more compressed!

The trend nowadays is to compress a lot, reducing the dynamic range as much as possible, which is bad for your ears and bad for musical finesse, but high compression levels allow for a high sound volume. It has been proved that a song is more attractive when played loudly, so record companies try to get the highest possible volume by compressing more and more. People are getting used to such high compression levels, they have become a standard and if you don't follow that trend, you may very well be looked down upon. Within a playlist, if the volume of a song is much lower than that of other songs, chances are the listener will just skip it, especially if they don't know it well and like it a lot. Yet, it would be so easy to simply raise the volume..

Here, the Wave Arts limiter FinalPlug is set with a threshold of -6 dB and a ceiling of -0.1 dB. This means that when the sound level reaches -6 dB, the signal will be boosted up to -0.1 dB. Release is set to Auto.
Here's the sound obtained with the limiter FinalPlug:


(mp3 file)
Wave Arts FinalPlug
Here is the dynamics measured after applying the limiter, at the same position in the song as the previous screenshot:
TT Dynamic Range Meter
As you can see, the RMS level goes from about -15 dB to about -9 dB, which corresponds to the 6 dB added with the limiter.
As for the dynamics range, it is reduced by about 3 dB, but we maintain around 10 dB.

Wave Arts FinalPlug is a commercial plugin. As an alternative, you may want to use the Classic Master Limiter from Kjaerhus.

Download Classic Master Limiter
(classic_master-limiter_v106.zip, 356 KB)


And with a free plugin...

Classic Master Limiter from Kjaerhus is a good limiter, very simple to use as there is only one knob. The only setting is the threshold. There is no ceiling setting, but it is in fact predefined to -0.2 dB. The sound obtained is slightly different from Wave Arts limiter's, but the difference is not that huge.
Here is the sound obtained with the Kjaerhus Classic Master Limiter:


(mp3 file)


Kjaerhus Classic Master Limiter
Top of page

CONCLUSION

Voilà... this tutorial is over. Mastering was the last stage.

From the begining, we went from...

a sound recorded in the box, with no effects:


(mp3 file)


We got to this version after mixing:


(mp3 file)


And obtained this final result after mastering:


(mp3 file)


Remember that this tutorial is not a magic formula that should be strictly followed all the time, with all songs of all genres. Mainly because it is not perfect, but also because there are many possible ways to mix a song to get various results. Finally, because each music, each song must be treated differently. Some plugins are useful for some songs and not for others, settings will need to change, etc.

I hope that with this tutorial, you understand better - if it wasn't already the case - how to mix a project, how to organize it, what is the purpose of the various plugins we used, how to set them, why you should use an EQ, a reverb, a compressor...

There are tons of other things to find out and learn, by yourself, with other people, through the Internet, this is a vast subject. Everyone has their habits, their hints and tips, but there's always more than one solution to a problem. Don't forget that the best way to improve your skills is to practice, again and again. So, experiment and have fun!!!

Mixing in practice : Preparing the session | Bass | Drums | Rhythm guitars | Solo guitars | Keyboards | Vocals | Mastering
Top of page


MESSAGES

(laisser un message)

Page de messages n° 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35



Fomega
le 21/08/2010 à 00h41

Salut MAN,

Je suis musicien (guitariste harmoniciste) amateur désirant me lancer dans le domaine de la MAO. Je suis vraiment émerveillé par ce travail que je juge titanesque sur ton site. Merci. En visitant certains sites de MAO, je n'ai jamais été autant satisfait que ce soir. J'ai vraiment trouvé mon compte. Bonne continuation MAN. Bon boulot...

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

<em>Grebz : Voilà qui me fait super plaisir ! Ravi de pouvoir aider, au moins un peu.</em>



Glagla
le 20/08/2010 à 14h27

Un grand Merci !!
Je monte mon 1er home studio... Habitué des vrais studios et tables analogiques, je suis (j'étais ..) perdu pour choisir les softs et le hardware.
Je ne connaissais pas ces sim d'ampli gratuites, le matos dont tu parles rentre dans mon raisonnable budget et tes explications claires me confortent dans mes choix.
Merci.


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

<em>Grebz : De rien, content que mes propres galères aujourd'hui résolues puissent aider d'autres personnes !
Bonne continuation musicale !</em>



Honeys
le 05/07/2010 à 17h40

Salut,

J''ai noté une grosse erreur au début quand tu dis que tu enregistres en 48 khz, c'est tout ce qu'il ne faut pas faire, parce que le gain de qualité est absolument inexistant mais par contre le calcul pour revenir en 44,1 est beaucoup plus complexe que de passer de 88,2 à 44,1 (division par 2), le 48 khz et le 96 khz sont utilisés en video uniquement, jamais en musique, donc si on enregistre en suréchantillonnage, on se met en 88,2 khz et c'est tout. Et encore, ce n'est pas non plus très utile parce que ça sert juste à repousser l'effet d'aliasing sur des fréquences qui ne seront de toute facon pas audibles (on enregistre avec un échantillonnage 2 fois supérieur à la fréquence de note la plus aiguë qu'on va enregistrer).
Or, au-delà de 20 khz et meme avant on n'entend plus rien, d'où la norme fixée à 44,1 KHz). Donc si on enregistre à plus de 44,1 KHz, ça veut dire qu'on s'occupe des fréquences situées après 20 khz, donc inutiles.
Après, je dis ça mais j''enregistre en 88,2 khz, mais c'est plus par principe parce que j'ai de la place que par réelle nécessité.
Mais en tout cas un truc est sûr, ne pas enregistrer en 96 KHz et encore moins en 48 khz car on a plus de perte à la conversion qu'autre chose :-)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

<em>Grebz  : Oui, c'est vrai, le standard de la musique sur CD est de 44,1 KHz. Il est donc plus logique d'enregistrer en 44,1 ou dans son multiple 88,2 KHz.

Cela dit, ceci est surtout valable si l'on enregistre ensuite sur CD... Or, le CD n'est pas systématiquement le support final. Beaucoup de gens n'écoutent plus que du MP3 ou du OGG, ou d'autres formats compressés et là, la fréquence d'enregistrement n'a plus d'importance.

Un fichier WAV en 48 KHz converti en MP3 donnera un MP3 à 48 KHz et un certain nombre de Kbits/s choisi par la personne qui fera la conversion.

Je rajouterai que je n'ai personnellement jamais entendu à l'oreille la moindre perte de qualité entre mon enregistrement de base (48 KHz en 24 bits) et le résultat une fois gravé sur CD (donc à 44,1 KHz en 16 bits).

Peut-être certains entendent-ils une différence, mais je ne connais personne capable de différencier les deux. Peut-être des ingénieurs du son à l'oreille entraînée, c'est possible...

Mais la fréquence choisie importe moins que la profondeur d'échantillonnage. 24 bits plutôt que 16 bits ! Ça c'est une certitude !</em>



CelticBreizh
le 15/04/2010 à 12h16

Concernant la repisse, j'ai vu des vidéos de séance d'enregistrement sur youtube je crois, où la chanteuse portait un casque, sans doute semi ouvert, et dont on avait bouché les deux côtés avec du gros ruban adhésif, genre tape grise. Je pense qu'ils avaient dû ajouter sous le ruban, de la mousse. Bref, peut-être une astuce pour garder ce très bon casque Beyer, mais chacun fait comme il l'entend, l'essentiel est de partager et c'est ce que fait Grebz à travers son site. Sans flatterie aucune, qu'il en soit vivement remercié.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

<em>Merci, c'est sympa !

Le Beyer DT990 me sert à tout : écouter de la musique, regarder des films, jouer sur mon PC.

Pour la musique, sa fiabilité me permet de mixer en confiance le soir, sans déranger ni le voisinage, ni ma famille. Je réécoute de toute façon le résultat obtenu sur mes enceintes de monitoring.

Le DT990 a tendance à faire plus ressortir les sons graves que mes enceintes. À partir du moment où je le sais, je peux en tenir compte.</em>



CelticBreizh
le 15/04/2010 à 01h39

Bonjour,
J'ai vu que vous utilisiez un casque Beyer Dynamic DT990, un excellent casque, mais je ne comprends pas comment vous faites pour vous enregistrer (voix) devant un micro statique par exemple. Pour moi, il ne s'agit pas véritablement d'un casque fermé comme le BEYER DT770 PRO 250 OHM. Par contre pour le mixage et l'enregistrement des guitares en direct, sans placement de micros devant les amplis, c'est certainement plus confortable et moins étouffant que le DT770.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

<em>Bonjour Éric,

Le DT990 est en effet un casque semi-ouvert et laisse passer du son que peut capter un micro statique. En fait, j'utilise généralement mon SM57 dynamique pour enregistrer les voix, ce qui résoud le problème de repisse du casque.

Le SM57 n'est sûrement pas le meilleur micro du monde pour enregistrer des voix, mais le résultat est loin d'être mauvais.

Il m'arrive parfois d'enregistrer des voix avec un micro Rode NT5, micro statique, et j'utilise dans ce cas un autre casque, fermé, un vieux casque hifi de moyenne qualité, mais très largement suffisant pour m'en servir simplement en monitoring le temps d'un enregistrement.

Je n'enregistre jamais mes guitares avec des micros, je passe toujours en direct en branchant mes guitares (électriques ou électro-acoustiques) sur l'interface audio, via un préampli. L'utilisation d'un casque est donc inutile dans ce cas.

Grebz</em>

Top of page