Messages | Version française |



? | Home page | Tutorial | Mixing in practice | Vocals

Site de Grebz
Home page



VOCALS

Reminder: we are working on the song Life, an original composition:


(mp3 file)

To record the vocals, I used a Rode NT5, a small-diaphragm condenser microphone that I also use for recording theater plays. It's a compact mic with a small diaphragm and excellent sensitivity. I find it more effective and faithful than the Shure SM57 dynamic mic I used previously. The high-end reproduction, in particular, is much better with the Rode, and the overall sound feels more open and airy. Like all condenser microphones, it requires 48V phantom power, which I activated on my preamp. The mic is connected via an XLR cable to my AudioBuddy transistor preamp by M-Audio—an affordable and very transparent preamp that adds no coloration or hiss—which is then linked to my audio interface.

In the song Life, there is one lead vocal track and two backing vocal tracks. These are recordings of my own voice using the Rode NT5. However, there are also two vocal tracks created with Miroslav Philharmonik, a virtual instrument software for classical sounds (violins, flutes, etc.), so I composed these virtual vocal parts on a MIDI track.

Here is the list of plugins I used for the vocals:
* FinalPlug by Wave Arts, a limiter
* Miroslav Philharmonik by IK Multimedia, a very comprehensive virtual philharmonic orchestra. It's not the absolute best, and it's quite old, but it remains excellent and especially unmatched at its current price (€120). I mainly use it to compose music for theater plays.
* WizooVerb by Wizoo, a reverb plugin
* TrackPlug by Wave Arts, a parametric equalizer
* Classic Delay by Kjaerhus Audio, a simple and free delay

Let's see how to process the different types of vocals, including volumes, panning, and plugins...

Lead Vocal Line

Backing Vocals

Virtual Vocals

Main Vocal Bus

Mixing in practice : Preparing the session | Bass | Drums | Rhythm guitars | Lead guitars | Synths | Vocals | Mastering
Haut de page

MAIN VOCALS

Recording Track - "Dry Lead Vocals" Bus - "Reverb" Bus - "Delay" Bus - "Lead Vocals" Bus

Recording Track

Mono audio track
Panning: Center
Volume: 0 dB
Plugin: Limiter
Destination: "Dry Lead Vocals" bus


When recording my voice, I made sure the recorded volume was around -10 dB to avoid any risk of clipping and to maintain enough headroom. However, since this volume is relatively low, I placed a limiter on the track to boost the signal significantly. This compression helps bring the vocals to the forefront compared to other instruments, though it is obviously not the only factor. My limiter is set with a threshold of -12 dB and a ceiling of -0.1 dB. The track signal is then routed to a bus I named "Dry Lead Vocals." The limiter used is the FinalPlug plugin by WaveArts. This is a paid plugin, which you can replace with George Yohng's W1 Limiter, an excellent free limiter downloadable on this page.

This track is routed to the bus I named "Dry Lead Vocals," described below.

"Dry Lead Vocals" Bus

Source: Lead vocal recording track
Destination: "Lead Vocal Reverb" and "Lead Vocal Delay" buses
Panning: Center
Volume: -23 dB.


The volume is set to a low value because the effects on other buses, which will be added later, will boost the overall volume of the lead vocals. Furthermore, sufficient headroom must be planned to avoid clipping the Master bus at the end of the chain—the bus where all instruments and vocals converge. If the volumes of all buses were at 0 dB, it would obviously cause a major problem on the Master bus, and likely even before reaching that final stage.

Here are the lead vocals as recorded, without effects:


(mp3 file)

The limiter on the track is not activated here, which is why the sound is very quiet.

This raw sound is then routed to two other buses: the bus containing the reverb, and the bus containing the delay. They are described one after the other below, but they are processed in parallel within the sequencer before converging further down the line.

"Lead Vocal Reverb" Bus

Source: "Dry Lead Vocals" bus
Destination: "Lead Vocals" bus
Panning: Center
Volume: -6 dB.


With its volume at -6 dB, the reverb is 6 dB lower than the dry vocals to avoid drowning them out. The goal is simply to add some "air" and ensure the sound isn't too dry.
Here are the lead vocals with reverb.
You only hear the reverb alone here, not mixed with the dry vocals.


(mp3 file)

I used the WizooVerb plugin, a plugin that hasn't been sold for several years but still sounds great. It can still be found in the darker corners of the internet (I don't condone this, but you do as you wish), or you can use other paid or free reverb plugins. They are easy to find, and I suggest a few on this page. I commonly use SIR Convolution, which works with impulses, much like cabinet simulators. But instead of using cabinet impulses, we use room impulses recorded in various locations (from bathrooms to cathedrals, concert halls, or rooms in a house).

Here are the settings used with the WizooVerb plugin by Wizoo:

- I used the "Vocal Church" preset. I reduced its "size" to 28% to avoid the impression of recording in too large a space; the decay time is set to 1.4s and I adjusted the "Width" parameters so the reverb spreads across the entire stereo field.

- The reverb blend is controlled with the "DryWet" knob. At 0%, no reverb is heard; at 100%, only the reverb is heard without the dry signal. Here, it is set to 100% because the reverb plugin is placed on a bus dedicated solely to reverb, which will later be mixed with other treatments (the dry sound and the delay). I only want the reverb sound and nothing else here.

- Using reverb on a voice is common. The dosage is up to each individual, but too much reverb distances the voice, which ends up drowned in the mix. For the lead vocal line, this is not the desired effect; on the contrary, the voice must be brought forward since it often carries the melody.
Wizooverb Plugin
Wizooverb Plugin

"Lead Vocal Delay" Bus

Source: "Dry Lead Vocals" bus
Destination: "Lead Vocals" bus
Panning: Center
Volume: 0 dB


Here are the lead vocals with delay.
You hear the delay added to the dry vocals here.


(mp3 file)

On this bus, I use the Classic Delay plugin by Kjaerhus Audio, a free plugin you can download on this page. The delay adds an echo effect to the sound, which helps fill out the sonic space. Combined with the reverb, this gives the lead vocal line a somewhat atmospheric feel.

The settings as seen in the image below produce an effect where the original sound arrives first (adding to the dry vocals), then a first echo appears after about 1 second, slightly quieter than the dry sound, and then 1 second later, a second echo is audible, but much quieter than the first. In the full mix of the song, it is almost inaudible, but it nonetheless contributes to the overall sound.

Classic Delay Plugin
Classic Delay Plugin

"Lead Vocals" Bus

Source: "Dry Lead Vocals", "Lead Vocal Reverb", and "Lead Vocal Delay" buses
Destination: Main Vocal bus
Panning: Center
Volume: -5 dB


The dry vocal, reverb, and delay buses now all converge into the "Lead Vocals" bus.
Here are the lead vocals with reverb and delay.


(mp3 file)

However, processing is not finished, as we are going to add an equalizer and a limiter.
Same thing, but with an equalizer and a limiter.
Heads up: the volume is much higher.


(mp3 file)

You can see in the image below how I equalized the voice. Specifically, I removed all low frequencies by placing a low-cut filter at 120 Hz. I also lowered the frequency around 1 kHz by about 3 dB, as it contributed nothing to the voice and freed up space for other instruments. Finally, I boosted the 345 Hz, 3.60 kHz, and 12 kHz frequencies by about 3 dB to better highlight the voice in the mix. Of course, these frequencies work for *my* voice and in this specific song, but in another song, the settings would be different. There is no single setting that fits all situations.

The plugin used is TrackPlug by Wave Arts, a paid plugin, but free ones exist, such as Cockos ReaEQ which you can download on this page.




TrackPlug Plugin
TrackPlug Plugin

Next, I applied a limiter with a threshold at -9 dB and a ceiling at 0 dB (thus limited to the bus volume), which significantly boosts the vocals to place them at the forefront of the song.

The plugin used is FinalPlug by Wave Arts, a paid plugin that you can replace with George Yohng's W1 Limiter, an excellent free limiter downloadable on this page.




FinalPlug Plugin
FinalPlug Plugin
That's it, the processing of the lead vocal line is complete. Below, we will see how I proceeded with the backing vocals, then with the virtual vocals. These three vocal groups will meet on the main vocal bus before finishing on the Master bus with all the other instruments of the song.

Mixing in practice : Preparing the session | Bass | Drums | Rhythm guitars | Lead guitars | Synths | Vocals | Mastering
Haut de page

BACKING VOCALS

There are two backing vocal recordings; one will be heard on the left and the other on the right of the stereo field. Both backing tracks have the same content, but it is not a copy-paste: I recorded the two backing tracks separately so that they differ slightly from one another.

Recording Tracks - Raw Takes - Reverb - "Backing Vocals 1" and "Backing Vocals 2" Buses - Automation

Recording Tracks

There are two vocal tracks for the backing vocals. I recorded them separately, so they are indeed two distinct recordings and not a simple copy-paste from one track to another.

Mono audio tracks
Panning: Center
Volume: 0 dB
Destination: The 1st track is routed to the "Dry Backing 1" and "Backing 1 Reverb" buses; the 2nd track is routed to the "Dry Backing 2" and "Backing 2 Reverb" buses


As with the lead vocal track, I recorded these two tracks ensuring the recorded volume stayed on average around -10 dB. However, I am not adding a limiter here.

The first backing track is then routed simultaneously to the "Dry Backing 1" and "Backing 1 Reverb" buses, while the second backing track is routed to the "Dry Backing 2" and "Backing 2 Reverb" buses.

"Dry Backing 1" and "Dry Backing 2" Buses

Sources: Backing 1 and Backing 2 tracks
Destinations: "Backing 1" Bus and "Backing 2" Bus
Panning: Center
Volumes: 0 dB


Here is Backing Vocal 1 as recorded without effects:


(mp3 file)

And Backing Vocal 2:


(mp3 file)

Of course, the two recordings are similar, as I tried to sing identically. But since I am not a machine (!), even when trying to do the same thing twice in a row, small differences remain. These aren't really audible but prevent having the exact same sound in both ears. With a copy-paste, if you place a sound on the left and its exact copy on the right, you end up with a mono sound in the end. Whereas with *nearly* identical sounds, you preserve the stereo. Unless you shift one sound by a few milliseconds relative to the other, which then creates a slight chorus effect.

Reverbs are added on two other buses, which will then be combined with the dry sound.

"Backing 1 Reverb" and "Backing 2 Reverb" Buses

Sources: Backing 1 and Backing 2 tracks
Destinations: "Backing 1" Bus and "Backing 2" Bus
Panning: Center
Volumes: -6 dB


Here is Backing Vocal 1 with reverb
You only hear the reverb alone here, not mixed with the raw vocals.


(mp3 file)

And the reverb for Backing Vocal 2:


(mp3 file)

I used the Wizooverb plugin again with the settings shown in the image below. Here are the settings used with the WizooVerb plugin by Wizoo:

- I used the "Cathedral" preset. I set the "size" to its maximum (100%) to achieve a large space effect and give the impression that the backing vocals are in the background. The decay time is set to 2.8s and I adjusted the "Width" parameters so the reverb spreads across the entire stereo field. However, as each backing vocal will only occupy the right side of the stereo field for one and the left for the other, each reverb will remain confined to the right for one and the left for the other. But at this stage, the panning is not yet set, so the examples place the sound in the center.

- The reverb amount is controlled with the "DryWet" knob. At 0%, no reverb is heard; at 100%, only the reverb is heard without the dry signal. Here, it is set to 100% because the reverb plugin is placed on a bus that only processes reverb, which will later be mixed with other treatments (in this case, the dry sound). Therefore, I only want the sound of the reverb and nothing else here.

- The reverb settings are identical for both backing vocals with one exception: for Backing Vocal 1, the "High Freq" parameter is set to 7107 Hz (as seen in the image below), while for Backing Vocal 2's reverb, this setting is at 3600 Hz. This means these high frequencies are not boosted the same way on both backing vocals. This setting is not available on all reverb plugins, but one could reproduce the same effect by adding an equalization plugin after the reverb with appropriate settings. This helps distinguish the two backing vocals a bit more.
Wizooverb Plugin
Wizooverb Plugin

"Backing 1" and "Backing 2" Buses

Sources: "Backing 1 Reverb" and "Backing 2 Reverb" buses
Destinations: Main Vocal bus
Panning: Variable, set by different automation on the two buses. Mostly 70% left for Backing Vocal 1 and 70% right for Backing Vocal 2.
Volumes: Variable, set by different automation on the two buses. Mostly at -10 dB.
Plugins: an equalizer and a limiter on each bus


Here is Backing Vocal 1 with dry sound and reverb:


(mp3 file)

And Backing Vocal 2:


(mp3 file)

I add an equalizer and a limiter, as well as the final stereo placement.
Here is Backing Vocal 1 with dry sound and reverb. It is located on the left in the stereo field:


(mp3 file)

And Backing Vocal 2. It is located on the right in the stereo field:


(mp3 file)

And finally, both together:


(mp3 file)

You can see in the image below how I equalized the backing vocals. Note that the settings are identical for Backing 1 and Backing 2. I cut all low frequencies by placing a brickwall low-cut filter at 125 Hz. This frequency is nonetheless boosted at +3 dB to provide some foundation in the low-mids. I scooped out the mids between 200 Hz and 2 kHz, with a more notable dip of -2.6 dB around 380 Hz. I boosted by +4.5 dB around 3.3 kHz. I scooped by 6 dB around 7.5 kHz and boosted by 3 dB around 13 kHz to bring in some air and brilliance to the backing vocals. Finally, I applied a brickwall high-cut at 16 kHz. There wasn't much useful information beyond this frequency anyway.

The plugin used is TrackPlug by Wave Arts, a paid plugin, but free ones exist, such as Cockos ReaEQ which you can download on this page.




TrackPlug Plugin
TrackPlug Plugin

Next, I applied a limiter with a threshold at -6 dB and a ceiling at 0 dB (thus limited to the bus volume), which boosts the backing vocals a bit to put them at the appropriate level relative to the lead vocal and other instruments.

The plugin used is FinalPlug by Wave Arts, a paid plugin that you can replace with George Yohng's W1 Limiter, an excellent free limiter downloadable on this page.




FinalPlug Plugin
FinalPlug Plugin

Automation

As mentioned earlier, I used automation for the volume and panning of Backing Vocals 1 and 2 in certain places. Here is an example. At about 2'14 into the song, you can hear voices that sound a bit like sighs. To give them movement while the voice lasts, I increased the volume from -18 dB to -10 dB, then brought it back down to -18 dB. At the same time, Backing 1 moves from center to 100% left then returns to 70% left, while Backing 2 moves from center to 100% right and ends at 70% right.
The sound therefore starts at the center and the backing vocals immediately move away to the left and right sides, while their volume increases then decreases.
Here is an example of Backing Vocal 1 automation:


(mp3 file)

Here is an example of Backing Vocal 2 automation:


(mp3 file)

And finally, both together:


(mp3 file)

Automation
Backing 1 and 2 automation, volume and panning
Backing vocal processing is finished. Below, we will look at the virtual vocals. These three vocal groups will meet on the main vocal bus before ending on the Master bus, along with all the other instruments in the song.

Mixing in practice : Preparing the session | Bass | Drums | Rhythm guitars | Lead guitars | Synths | Vocals | Mastering
Haut de page

VIRTUAL VOCALS

In addition to the backing vocals, I use voices from the Miroslav Philharmonik software, a VSTi that offers orchestral sounds, including male and female choirs recorded by professionals from a classical orchestra. These voices are not brought to the forefront, but they add a slightly dreamlike atmosphere to the song.

Recording Tracks - "Phil Choir 1" and "Phil Choir 2" Buses - Reverb - Automation - "Philharmonik Choir" Bus

Recording Tracks

Mono MIDI tracks linked to tracks
Panning: Center
Volume: 0 dB
Destination: The first track is routed to the "Phil Choir 1" bus; the second track is routed to the "Phil Choir 2" bus


There are two virtual vocal tracks. These are MIDI compositions and not recordings via a microphone. Each of the two virtual vocal tracks consists of an audio track with an instance of the Miroslav Philharmonik plugin, associated with a MIDI track containing the MIDI score.

Both tracks are made with female choir sounds. The first track consists of choirs performing "oh" vocalizations, and the second track consists of choirs performing "ah" vocalizations.
Miroslav Philharmonik
Miroslav Philharmonik

"Phil Choir 1" and "Phil Choir 2" Buses

Sources: "Philharmonik 1" and "Philharmonik 2" tracks
Destination: "Philharmonik Choir" Bus
Panning: Variable, set by different automation on the two buses.
Volume: Variable, set by automation that changes from time to time throughout the song.
Plugins: Reverb


Here are the virtual choirs 1 without reverb:


(mp3 file)

And virtual choirs 2:


(mp3 file)

Although these voices are samples of real voices, this composition doesn't sound very realistic, as that is not the goal. For example, all the notes flow into each other, whereas real singers would need to take breaks to breathe. But in the context of the song Life, these voices are not highlighted at all; they only serve to fill the soundscape in the background. It is therefore unnecessary to worry about details that no one will ultimately hear. The goal is rather to achieve a pleasant and dreamlike background sound rather than a stunning orchestral choir that grips you.

Reverb

I placed a reverb on each of these same buses, "Phil Choir 1" and "Phil Choir 2".

Here are the virtual choirs 1 with reverb:


(mp3 file)

And the reverb for virtual choirs 2:


(mp3 file)

Here too, I used the Wizooverb plugin with the settings shown in the image below.

Here are the settings used with the WizooVerb plugin by Wizoo:

- I used the Cathedral preset. I set the "size" to 80% to achieve a significant space effect and give the impression that the choirs are in the background. The decay time is set to 2.4s. I adjusted the "Width" parameters so that the reverb spreads across the entire stereo field. At this stage, the panning is not yet set, so the audio examples place the sound in the center.

- The reverb amount is controlled with the "DryWet" knob. At 0%, no reverb is heard; at 100%, only the reverb is heard and no longer the dry sound. Here, it is set to 100%, and since the reverb plugin is placed on the bus where the raw voices arrive, only the reverberated sound will be heard in the song and not the dry sound at all.
Wizooverb Plugin
Wizooverb Plugin

Automation

Still on the same "Phil Choir 1" and "Phil Choir 2" buses, I applied volume automation (with only a few variations throughout the song) and, most importantly, panning automation. The virtual choirs constantly move from right to left, crossing each other, since the automations for the two virtual choirs are symmetrical. When one is on the left, the other is on the right and vice versa.

The image below corresponds to the passage heard in the audio clips; the volume doesn't move, but as you can see, the panning constantly shifts from left to right. This is clearly audible in the clips below.

Virtual Choir 1 Automation:


(mp3 file)

Virtual Choir 2 Automation:


(mp3 file)

Automation
Virtual Choir 1 and 2 automation, volume and panning

"Philharmonik Choir" Bus

Sources: "Phil Choir 1" and "Phil Choir 2" buses
Destination: Main Vocal bus
Panning: Center
Volume: 0 dB.
Plugins: an equalizer


This is the bus where the two virtual vocal buses converge. I apply fairly strong equalization that cuts all low and high frequencies, keeping only the mids around 1 kHz. This ensures they don't occupy too many frequencies, leaving plenty of room for other instruments in the song without sacrificing the quality of the chosen virtual voices. This aggressive equalization doesn't seem to denature the virtual voices, which are in the background of the mix anyway.

Virtual Choir 1 Automation (with EQ):


(mp3 file)

Virtual Choir 2 Automation (with EQ):


(mp3 file)

And finally, both together:


(mp3 file)

The processing of virtual voices is finished. These voices will now join the lead vocal and backing vocals on the main vocal bus, as we will see below.

Mixing in practice : Preparing the session | Bass | Drums | Rhythm guitars | Lead guitars | Synths | Vocals | Mastering
Haut de page

MAIN VOCAL BUS

Sources: "Lead Vocal" bus, "Backing 1" and "Backing 2" buses, "Philharmonik Choir" bus
Destination: Master Bus
Panning: Center
Volume: -7 dB.
Plugins: None


The different types of voices from the buses described above converge on this bus: lead vocals, backing vocals, and virtual voices. No plugins are necessary here, as all the processing I needed was applied previously.
Here is the final result of all the voices together on the main vocal bus:


(mp3 file)

Finally, the main vocal bus is routed to the Master bus to converge with all the other instruments in the song.

Mixing in practice : Preparing the session | Bass | Drums | Rhythm guitars | Lead guitars | Synths | Vocals | Mastering
Haut de page
Top of page


MESSAGES

(leave a message)

Messages page # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35



CelticBreizh
le 12/04/2010 à 22h00

Encore merci de votre réponse. Je me demande même si je ne vais pas craquer pour votre carte qui a plus de réglages en façade, laissant l'arrière aux Jacks et à l'alim.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

<em>Comme vous voulez, mais avez-vous vraiment besoin de 8 entrées ? Dont seulement 2 avec préampli (les deux à l'avant) ? À vous de voir,

Grebz</em>



CelticBreizh
le 12/04/2010 à 09h21

Bonjour,

J'envisage l'acquisition d'une nouvelle interface audio type EDIROL FA-66 et je voulais savoir ce que vous en pensiez étant donné que vous avez déjà une EDIROL FA-101, un modèle un peu semblable mis à part le nombre important d'entrées.

Ma carte Presonus me joue des tours mais je souhaiterais rester sur une connexion en firewire. Pouvez-vous me dire si c'est un bon choix ?

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

<em>Bonjour Éric,

<a href="http://fr.audiofanzine.com/carte-son-externe/edirol/FA-66/avis/">Les avis sur Audiofanzine</a> sont tous très bons. Visiblement les utilisateurs sont satisfaits de leur achat. De mon côté, je suis également satisfait de ma FA-101 qui ne m'a jamais fait défaut, que j'enregistre seul chez moi en n'utilisant qu'une seule entrée, ou bien en enregistrant un groupe en live avec 8 entrées simultanées. Les préamplis de la carte ne sont pas extraordinaires, mais devraient suffire néanmoins. En cas de besoin, il sera toujours possible de leur adjoindre ultérieurement un préampli externe supplémentaire.

La connexion Firewire a l'avantage d'utiliser très peu de ressources processeur (moins qu'une connexion USB), ce qui permet de libérer ces ressources supplémentaires pour le séquenceur, d'être très stable et d'avoir une bande passante supérieure à l'USB 2.
Dans le cas de la musique, toutefois, cette dernière caractéristique n'a pas vraiment d'importance. C'est plus important dans le domaine de la vidéo.

Au niveau des défauts, la connexion Firewire nécessite l'utilisation d'une alimentation secteur lors d'une utilisation sur un portable. La prise mini-Firewire qu'on trouve sur les portables ne peut pas fournir d'alimentation électrique contrairement à l'USB. Donc, il faudra brancher l'interface sur le secteur, ce qui fait des branchements en plus. Mais pour une installation fixe, ce n'est pas trop gênant.

Les drivers de la FA-101 sont stables, ils existent en 32 et 64 bits et fonctionnent sous Windows XP, Vista et Seven. Il me semble que les drivers sont communs pour la FA-101 et la FA-66... en tout cas, les fichiers qui composent ces drivers, téléchargés sur <a href="http://www.rolandus.com/products/productdetails.php?ProductId=731">le site d'Edirol</a>, sont quasiment identiques à 2 ou 3 détails près. La FA-66 n'est de toute manière qu'une FA-101 allégée, elles doivent sortir du même moule !

Donc oui, je peux vous recommander cette interface audio. De toute façon, achetez-la et essayez-la, vous avez légalement une semaine pour vous rétracter auprès de votre vendeur.

Grebz
</em>



Jikoo
le 12/04/2010 à 01h42

Superbe page (simulateurs d'ampli) !
J'ai appris plein de choses. C'est vraiment très intéressant. Merci beaucoup et bonne continuation.

Jerry Coox - Musicien
(Facile à trouver sur le web !)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

<em>Merci à vous !

Je rajoute un lien vers <a href="http://www.myspace.com/jerrycoox" target="_blanck">votre MySpace</a>, j'ai écouté ce que vous faites, c'est vraiment très bien !

Grebz</em>



CelticBreizh
le 24/03/2010 à 20h06

Bonjour,

Merci encore de votre précédente réponse.
Pour information, voila ce que j'ai relevé sur mon portable ACER :
Avant tout, j'ai pensé à ce portable parce qu'il est silencieux. Je ne dispose pas d'une pièce dédiée et suis en fauteuil roulant. Ce n'est pas toujours simple pour tous les branchements. Dans la MAO, je cherche juste à mettre de la musique, piste à piste, derrière mes textes. Alors maintenant mon ordinateur portable, c'est :
Modèle Aspire type 5670 / 5673 WLMi
Processeur : Intel Core Duo T2400 (1.83 GHz, 667 MHz FSB, 2MB L2 cache)
En fait, c'est un Intel Centrino Duo destiné plus particulièrement aux portables.
L'écran est un 15.4 pouces WXGA. C'est un peu petit pour y caser le séquenceur, la table de mixage, les VST et VSTi etc... ça finit par être complètement brouillon. Je sais qu'il me faut un autre écran (d'ailleurs mon portable peut l'accepter). Le séquenceur d'un côté et de l'autre, le mix et tous le reste. Ce serait plus clair. J'envisage effectivement l'achat d'un 24 ou 26 pouces.
La vidéo, c'est bien sûr de l'intégré, ATI Mobility Radeon X 1600
Le disque dur : 120 GB SATA partitionné. J'ai un disque dur externe Western Digital Caviar d'1To acheté récemment.
La mémoire : 2 Go DDR2 (support dual channel).
C'est sans doute là que ça pêche le plus, avec 2 Go et mon processeur centrino, je vais vite atteindre les limites si j'utilise beaucoup de VST ou VSTi.
Un petit plus, j'ai une prise FireWire sur laquelle je branche ma carte son externe Presonus Fire Box.
Je n'ai pas encore de préampli mais j'envisage d'en acheter un. Un petit et modeste appareil, je n'ai ni les prétentions, ni les moyens d'un studio professionnel.
J'ai repéré chez Thomann en Allemagne un ART TUBE MP à 38€. Ce sera sans doute mieux que rien vu que je n'en utilisais pas avant. Ça me fait 2 alim de 48 Volts pour mon micro statique SAMSON.
Par contre, j'utilise un EDIROL PCR - A30 et là, j'ai sans doute encore mal choisi puisqu'apparemment il serait doté d'une Audio Interface, cette interface n'était sans doute pas nécessaire puisque j'avais déjà une carte son PRESONUS ???
Ce clavier se branche en USB mais est aussi doté d'un transfo, c'est peut-être plus stable, je ne sais pas.
Les infos relevées sur ce clavier : EDIROL PCR - A30 - ROLAND, 24 Bit 96 kHz Digital Audio, USB Audio Interface, Midi Key Board Controller.
Je sais que l'on peut contrôler certaines fonctions mais j'avoue que je ne l'utilise que comme un clavier midi. Je suis loin d'en tirer le maximum.
Un ami me l'avait conseillé mais maintenant, je ne sais pas si c'est un bon choix.
Et pour finir, je suis sous XP, et j'aimerais le rester.
C'est un portable que je veux remettre à plat en formatant et en le consacrant uniquement au son et rien d'autre.
La connexion Internet (pour les mises à jour windows) sera coupée pendant le travail sous Cubase, de même qu'Avast, mon antivirus. J'espère ainsi alléger le système. Il n'y aura même pas de messagerie.

Au fait, comment fait-on pour geler des pistes ?

Je suis preneur de tous conseils. D'avance merci.

CelticBreizh



CelticBreizh
le 24/03/2010 à 01h45

Bonjour,

Un excellent site qui permet de s'y retrouver facilement dans la MAO.

Avant de trouver des séquenceurs "non limités", j'avais investi dans bon nombre de matériels, tables de mixage, racks en tous genres dont compresseur, ampli casques, microverb Alesis etc... tout en analogique bien entendu. Certaines tables de mixage étaient dotées d'une alim phantom pour mon micro statique, d'où cet achat que je regrette maintenant compte tenu des possibilités des petites cartes son externes bien suffisantes à mon goût (ma presonus gère le 48V). Quand Cubase a pu gérer correctement l'audio et pas seulement le midi, j'ai soigneusement rangé tout ce matériel. Pour un temps, j'ai continué à me servir de ma table de mixage mais, l'encombrement fait que je vais me résoudre à utiliser le mix du séquenceur mais l'écran d'un portable n'est pas extensible et cela devient vite un casse tête d'ouvrir toutes ces fenêtres à l'écran et avoir constamment la main sur la souris. Mon portable n'a que 2 Go de ram, j'espère qu'il ne plantera pas durant les enregistrements que je faisais avant sur un fixe assemblé par mes soins. Pourquoi alors ce portable ? Moins de bruit, moins d'encombrement, moins de fils. Bien que vieux de 4 ans, son processeur est un double-coeur. Je vais lui adjoindre un disque dur externe et j'espère que cela suffira pour mes compos. Si vous pouviez me donner votre avis éclairé sur mon modeste matériel, merci d'avance.

En tous cas, bravo pour les sujets abordés, ça a le mérite d'être clair alors que d'autres auraient traité cela de façon ultra technique sans que je puisse m'y retrouver.

À bientôt. Éric

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

<em>Bonjour Éric,

Tout d'abord merci de votre message sur mon site, ça fait plaisir de voir que je peux rendre service à quelqu'un. Si je fais cela, c'est parce que moi-même, j'ai pas mal galéré en me lançant dans la MAO voici quelques années et que j'ai eu du mal à m'y retrouver face à toutes ces notions déroutantes au départ. Je ne suis pas devenu un spécialiste pour autant, mais j'ai appris suffisamment pour essayer d'aider à mon tour, dans un langage que j'espère accessible au plus grand nombre, sans verser non plus dans l'abêtissement. Il faut parfois appeler un chat un chat (ou un compresseur un compresseur) pour éviter les dérives de langage qui perdent tout le monde... Bref.

En ce qui concerne votre matériel analogique, je ne sais pas s'il faut regretter de l'avoir acheté. J'imagine que financièrement, ça représente un investissement et qu'il est toujours dommage de s'apercevoir au bout de quelques temps qu'on n'a pas forcément fait le bon choix, mais malheureusement, dans les domaines "techniques" (informatique, musique, vidéo...), il sort constamment de nouveaux équipements qui supplantent les anciens et si on attend le bon moment... on ne se lance jamais ! Après, il y a l'encombrement qui peut également poser problème. Mais l'analogique a aussi des qualités : le son (évidemment, tout dépend du matériel), et la manipulation physique, plus naturelle à l'usage qu'une souris. Mais tout est question d'habitude.

Pour ce qui est de votre matériel actuel, un portable, vous avez vous-même parlé de ses limites : la taille de l'écran qui fait qu'on se sent vite à l'étroit, et le fait qu'il soit déjà un peu ancien (en termes informatiques bien entendu).
Pour l'écran, il vous est toujours possible de lui adjoindre un écran plat si vous disposez de la place suffisante, et du budget bien entendu. Un bon écran plat de bonne taille (disons 24 ou pourquoi pas, soyons fou, 26 pouces !) ajoutera beaucoup de confort pour un tarif à situer entre 200 et 300 euros selon la marque et la qualité attendue. Non négligeable, mais très confortable. Il est même possible de disposer ainsi d'un double écran, sur le portable et sur l'écran supplémentaire, à condition que la carte graphique du portable gère cette fonctionnalité, ce qui est bien souvent le cas.

Avoir un processeur dual-core est un avantage évident, tout dépend cependant du processeur en question. Certains dual-core un peu anciens ne sont pas très puissants, rien ne remplace un bon test par soi-même pour tester les limites de la machine.

J'utilise moi-même un portable de marque ASUS. Je l'ai acheté voici bientôt 3 ans, il a également un processeur dual-core à 2,5 GHz et 3 Go de mémoire. Fourni à l'origine avec Windows Vista, je l'ai remplacé récemment par Windows 7 en version 64 bits.

Voilà ce que je peux vous dire de mon expérience avec ce portable pour une utilisation musicale :
Déjà, je ne l'utilise pour la musique qu'en déplacement, puisque j'utilise normalement mon ordinateur de bureau, bien plus puissant. Ce que j'ai constaté, c'est qu'il réagit mieux lorsque j'utilise mon séquenceur Sonar en version 32 bits qu'en version 64 bits. j'ai installé les 2 versions et cette dernière est plus lourde semble-t-il. C'est en tout cas mon ressenti.
Hormis cela, aucun souci pour enregistrer. J'ai déjà enregistré plusieurs fois des concerts live, avec parfois jusqu'à 8 pistes simultanément, pour un enregistrement sans interruption pendant un peu moins de 3 heures. Ni le disque dur, ni le processeur (très peu sollicité par l'enregistrement) n'ont montré de signes de faiblesse. Le disque dur est pourtant un simple disque à 5400 tours par minute, donc pas franchement un foudre de guerre.
J'ai également enregistré une pièce de théâtre amateur en branchant simultanément une carte son USB et un caméscope FireWire et donc en enregistrant 2 pistes audio sur sonar, pendant que la vidéo s'enregistrait (sur le même disque dur) via un logiciel de montage. Toujours sans souci.

En fait, je trouve les limites de mon ordinateur portable lors de l'utilisation de plugins VST ou d'instruments VSTi. Là, je constate une nette différence avec mon PC de bureau. Mon processeur de portable sature bien plus vite. Mais j'avoue que j'utilise pas mal de plugins, parfois plusieurs dizaines sur un projet. La seule solution dans ce cas est de "geler" les pistes, de façon à libérer le processeur. Si vous utilisez peu de VST, il ne devrait pas y avoir de problème, mais dans le cas contraire, attendez-vous à rencontrer des ralentissements, voire des interruptions de lecture. Et lors d'enregistrements, désactivez les plugins inutiles pour soulager le processeur.

Quant aux 2 Go de mémoire, c'est peut-être un peu juste avec Windows Vista, mais cela devrait suffire pour XP ou Windows 7. Sachez qu'avec un 32 bits, Windows ne laisse pas plus de 3 à 3,5 Go de mémoire disponible pour l'utilisateur, et que chaque application ne peut disposer que de 2 Go au maximum. Le système lui-même va consommer une partie variable de la mémoire selon les applications et services installés.

C'est l'intérêt d'un système en 64 bits : à condition que le processeur le gère, un système 64 bits va pouvoir utiliser l'intégralité de la mémoire à sa disposition, et les applications 64 bits ne seront pas limitées non plus. Mais un logiciel 32 bits sur un système 64 bits sera toujours limité à 2 Go. Pour aller au-delà, il faut que le logiciel soit lui-même programmé en 64 bits.

Voilà ce que je peux vous dire. Musicalement vôtre,

Grebz</em>

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Merci d'avoir pris le temps de me répondre. ça me semble si clair maintenant. Un grand merci et encore bravo pour votre site.

Éric

Top of page