Version française


? | Home page | Tutorial | Recording

Homepage
Home page



RECORDING

Preparing the session
Drums
Guitars and bass
Vocals

Here is some advice to make recordings in good conditions.
Top of page

PREPARING THE SESSION

Before anything else, we need to prepare the recording session. We are not going to look for a melody, nor improvise or rehearse... we are going to properly record a song that we have already written. To avoid doing the same things over again each time I wish to record a song, I prepared a blank template which contains all the tracks and buses I need. I may naturally add or delete some elements if the template is not appropriate for the current project.

What does my template look like?

Track-wise:
- Rhythm guitar tracks (from 2 to 8 depending on the project)
- Solo guitar tracks (usually 2 tracks to make the sound thicker)
- Two bass tracks (one with the direct raw sound, and one with an amp simulation)
- Lead vocal tracks (usually one or two tracks, depends if I record it twice or not)
- Background vocals tracks (if the project demands it)
- Keyboard tracks (same thing, the number of virtual instruments will depend on the project, can be none, can be 5 or 6...)

Then we have drum tracks. There is one track per drum element. They are automatically created when I insert my virtual drum plugin:
- Kick drum
- Snare drum
- Low tom
- Medium tom
- High tom
- Hi-hat
- Crash cymbal
- Ride cymbal
- Splash cymbal
- Overhead microphone
- Room Ambiance microphone
- Piezzo microphone
- One MIDI track on which the drum score will be placed.

Bus-wise, I have one group for the guitars, one for the bass, one for the vocals, one for the drums, each of them is redirected towards the Master bus, which goes out throuh my studio monitors. It looks like this:

Track/bus structure
Track/bus structure

What is a track? what is a bus?

Tracks are where you record an audio or a MIDI instrument. For instance, track 1 will contain guitar parts, track 2 will contain guitar parts of a second guitar, track 3 will get bass parts, track 4 will have vocals, etc. Everyone organize their tracks as they feel more appropriate.


Tracks
Tracks
Tracks in Sonar's Console view

Bus
Bus: uh... yeah, but no...

Buses do not carry recordings. They are groups of tracks. For instance, you can add a "Guitars" bus towards which you will redirect your guitar tracks. Thus, you may allocate common effects without adding these effects to each and every guitar track. Just put the effect on the bus, and each track will produce the desired effect. This will also allow you to mute all the tracks connected to a bus, or to solo them in one click. Again, you may organize your buses the way you want, and you will find the use of buses very convenient.


Bus
Bus

Buses in Sonar's Console view

Both tracks and buses can be either mono or stereo. In today's D.A.W.s, the number of tracks and buses you can create is not limited. Actually, the only limit are your needs, and the power of your computer's processor.

Track view
Track view

Sonar's track view.
The size of the "Tracks" and "Buses" windows can be modified at will.


Finally, before we start, and if your gear and software allow you to do so, choose to record in 24 bits, the internal calculations and the sound quality will be more accurate. Once your session is prepared, the recording can start. Start with what, by the way? Well, I always start with the drums, let me tell you why...

Top of page

DRUMS

Recording an acoustic real drum kit is far from being easy, even for professional sound engineers. It a time-consuming process, it's frequent to spend several hours placing the microphones around the drum elements before you can actually record. But we are in a home studio, and we will have to deal with a software drum kit, based on midi files...
First of all, why start with the drums? The answer is simple, we will use drums as a metronome. The drums sound will guide us and help us follow the tempo. This will allow for an even recording and the song will not speed up or slow down unintentionally. Of course, variations can be interesting and bring some life to an otherwise mechanical tempo, but let's consider that a studio session seeks recording perfection, even though it's only a home studio.

I usually have no idea what my final drum track will sound like. Actually, I only adjust it when the rest of the song is finished. But I still need its metronome function to record all other instruments. Thus, I create a drum track which repeats itself over and over again, and I try to have this loop match what I am about to play (no punk rhythm to record a ballad). For instance, I'll use one of these patterns:




Each sample contains one or several "normal" loops and ends with a "fill" loop that will play at transition moments, like going from verse to chorus, or chorus to bridge, etc. This can help when recording. I put as many patterns as needed on my drum track, and I place a few additional bars (usually 2 are enough) at the very beginning in order to feel the tempo and start recording in tempo. These additional bars will be deleted at the end.
Recording starts at measure 3
Now that we have a metronome drum track, we can proceed with the recording of the other instruments. Guitars and bass follow...

Top of page

GUITARS AND BASS

Let's not forget we are recording in a home studio, in an appartment and it is simply impossible to play with a good old 100-watt tube amplifier, without the neigbors calling the police. So we are going to have to record the guitars and the bass directly through the audio interface. No real amplifier, no microphones involved. The latter solution would be preferable, but on of the benefits of direct recording, coupled with amplifier simulators, is that you can always edit the sound later, without having to re-record. Just change the settings and you're done.

So now... bass or guitars first? There isn't one clear answer. Bass and drums are the foundation, the rhythm base of a song and everything else should rely on them. But other factors could also be taken into consideration: for instance, the person recording may be more comfortable with a guitar than a bass, and will rather play guitar first. Or maybe the song has a very important bass riff that compels you to record it first. In any case, you are the one who can decide. If you are uncertain, then the drum / bass duo is a safe bet. If this is in place, then the rest can easily be added.

Guitar or bass, the recording process will be the same. Plug your guitar into the pre-amp, the pre-amp is connected to the audio interface (or plug your guitar directly into the audio interface if using the interface's pre-amp), and set the recording level. This is very important! Before recording anything, check that you are not going to go beyond the maximum level (0 dB, zero decibel). In a home studio, you won't have a sound engineer besides you to make adjustments on the fly, while you are playing. You are the one to take precautions. How can you do that? Simple: try and adjust, it doesn't take long and will prevent you from making a perfect take, then realize the levels were too low or too high, forcing you to do it all over again.

Have a try: for a rhythm guitar for example, play the loudest parts and set the preamp and audio interface volume levels in such way that when you play the loudest, the recording level doesn't go beyond -6 dB. The absolute maximum that you should not reach or go beyond is zero dB. If you play in your try the same way you play during the actual recording, then you can be certain the recording level will be correct. If your average level is between -9 db and -6 dB, then your level is sufficient and you have a margin of error before clipping.

Clipping is the term used to indicate that you reach or go beyond 0 dB. Clipping is your enemy :-)

No clipping    With clipping
You can clearly see here the difference between a take with a correct level, and the same take with too much gain. On the right, the sound is crushed, there are no distinction between the peaks and the troughs. Let's zoom in:

No clipping, zoom    Clipping, zoom
If you zoom in, you can see that the right curve is beheaded, anything that goes beyond 0 dB is crushed. Why is that wrong? Because the sound gets distorted, saturated. And you should avoid this, unless you voluntarily seek to give a headache to your listeners.

Example of clipping with vocals:
    

With a guitar:
    
No clipping (left) and with clipping (right)
Alright? Your levels are checked? Then go for it, record your guitar and bass tracks.

Set your guitar as you wish by using the bass, treble and microphone buttons. Try to avoid very low sounds (muffled) or very high sounds (shrill). The sound you record should be pleasing to the ear. Remember that, when mixing time comes, you won't be able to magically bring to life what was not recorded in the first place. A high-pitched sound will never produce a warm low sound, even by tweaking the knobs. So think in advance what you wish to obtain in order to choose your sounds in a coherent and logical way.

Now stay in tempo and if you make a mistake, start over. Once the song is complete and starts spreading around you, it will be too late to regret a bad take. So do things well now. Not everybody is as talented as Jimmy Page (Led Zeppelin), Eric Clapton, Slash or Matthew Bellamy (Muse) and everybody can make mistakes. There is no emergency, and if you have to record the same take 30 times, do it. Do and re-do until you are fully satisfied. Record and carefully listen to the take, especially if your think it's the right one. Regularly save your project. You never know if your computer will crash and make you lose hours of work.

If this helps, record with the guitar sound you chose (see amplifier simulators), but for the time being, what counts is the quality of the recording, not that of the amplifier sound. This is what's so great about the amp sims, you can edit the sound whenever you want. We'll see that later, when mixing.

OK, you have now recorded all the guitar tracks you needed. Maybe your song requires only one track, or maybe you needed 8 tracks, that's up to you to decide. It can be interesting to double the takes, in order to thicken the sound. But remember, the more instruments and tracks there are, the more difficult mixing becomes, because it's more complicated to have all instruments coexist. Looking for a "bigger sound" doesn't necessarily requires multiplying the tracks, it can also be achieved by using the appropriate effects.

Of course, the bass is also a guitar (a bass guitar...), so the recording constraints are identical to those of the guitar. Check your recording levels to avoid clipping, and above all, stay in tempo, or the song will sound shaky.

Top of page

VOCALS

I prefer to record them last but there are no rules. If you prefer to record them first, then do so.

To record vocals, make sure the place is quiet, shut the door, tell the people who live with you to be quiet, and do not record while your neighbor is drilling holes through his kitchen walls! Also, turn off your monitors and use a headset instead to avoid recording the playback with your microphone.

Condenser or dynamic microphones?

Dynamic microphones are solid, they don' need a power source, they can take heavy acoustic pressure (like a kick drum or a saxophone) and they are not too expensive. They are also less sensitive to surrounding noises than condenser microphones. The cons are they lack clarity in the high range, which renders takes less clear and defined than with condenser microphones. They can be used with Jack or XLR plugs.

Condenser microphones are much more responsive and accurate. Their high sensitivity is double-edged, because they will capture any noise when recording. The fans of your PC are noisy? Chances are this noise will be recorded. Sound comes out of your headset? It will be recorded by your condenser microphone. Children are loudly playing outside? You might get that too. However, some condenser microphones are called "cardioid", or "hyper cardioid", and they only record what comes from a specific direction, ignoring (more or less) other sound sources from other directions. On the contrary, omnidirectional microphones record what comes from anywhere. Not ideal for a home studio. Condenser microphones are also more fragile (don't knock them) and must be powered through a "phantom power", whose standard is 48 volts. This kind of power is either present on your audio interface and can be turned on and off with a button, or it will require the use of an external phantom power source that you will then connect to your audio interface. You have to use 3-pin XLR plugs that carry the phantom power current. Finally, condenser microphones are usually rather expensive, some of them cost several thousand euros (or dollars, or pounds), but only professional studios or rich amateurs can afford those. On the plus side, the sound you get with a condenser microphone will have the best quality.

Be cautious though, a good dynamic microphone is worth better than a bad condenser microphone. No big secret here, for microphones like for anything else, very low prices are rarely synonymous with good quality.

A few known and renowned microphone brands: AKG, Milab, Neumann, Rode, Sennheiser, Shure...

Jack plug    XLR plug

Jack plug (left) and XLR (right)
Some pieces of advice: buy a microphone stand and a pop filter (you can also make one yourself with wire and a piece of tights from your wife / girlfriend / mother / daughter / neighbor). The stand will prevent you from manually holding your microphone and thus produce handling noises. As for the pop filter, it prevents the air to hit the microphone and produce unwanted blowing sounds when you pronounce some letters such as "p" or "b".
Microphone stand    Pop filter

Microphone stand and pop filter
Furthermore, try to stay in front of the microphone when you sing, don't move from right to left or back and forth in order to avoid big volume variations. Dynamic microphones will not record you correctly if you stand too far from the microphone (8 inches, 20 centimeters would be a lot, meaning you can easily go too far). Don't let this piece of advice prevent you from "feeling" your song. If thinking about your position prevents you to have emotions, just forget about it but try to remember that the less you move away from the microphone, the better the quality. Nevertheless, if you have to really scream all of a sudden (I think about Frank Black from the Pixies, who goes from whispering to howling in an instant), you should then step back from the microphone in order to avoid clipping.

Just like the guitar recording, you have to set the recording level of your vocals before the take. Have some tries and check once again that the level doesn't go beyond 0 dB. Now, if you plan on having very different volume levels, using the howling moments as a reference will render the quiet moment barely audible. So, either you live with that (but you could bring some noise when compressing the quiet sounds during mixing), or you make several takes, with different level settings for the quiet and loud moments. You can also get the help of a friend who knows the song and will manually adjust the levels on the fly.

I also advise you stand up when recording vocals. Singing while sitting is a bad habit, as it prevents you from breathing deeply and could compromise your vocal amplitude. When standing, singers can better "live" their song. Look at studio recording videos: singers stand. Not only because it looks nice on the video, but for breathing reasons. Also think about carrying your voice. I am not saying you should scream (unless it is required in the song), but you should carry the voice. If you're mumbling, people will hear it. Think of Mick Jagger, David Bowie, Elvis Presley or Freddy Mercury, they carry their voice. You can clearly hear when they refrain, then just let go. So let go, let your future listeners feel that you gave it all, that you lived your song. But once again, unless it is voluntary, do not force it. You are not taking part in a shouting contest!!!

Unless you have a natural gift (and even then...), be aware that singing requires work to be mastered. Nobody becomes a great singer without practice. Do not overestimate your capabilities. Each of us has a singing range (tessitura) that can only be broadened through training. This is the range of notes one can sing, from the lowest to the highest. Needless to sing a note that is too high-pitched for you. If you cannot reach it (not yet), forcing won't help you much. At best, it will sound awful, at worst, you'll damage your vocal cords.

Top of page

No need to go on and on forever, recording is rather easy. As long as you pay attention to your recording levels and take care over your takes, you should get a satisfying result, good enough to finalize the song

Next: Mixing in theory
Top of page


MESSAGES

(leave a message)

Messages page # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35



Only
le 19/01/2011 à 21h18

Je suis en République Démocratique du Congo,dans la capitale Kinshasa. Je voudrais monter un home studio avec une bonne qualité de son. Je veux savoir comment installer le matériel, quelle est la disposition. C'est possible de monter un home studio avec un budget de 5000 euros ?

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
<em>Je ne connais pas les tarifs au Congo, mais avec 5000 euros, tu peux déjà te faire plaisir. Après, tout dépend de ce que tu cherches. Si tu n'as rien du tout et que tu veux te faire un local avec isolation sonore, acheter un ordinateur, des logiciels et puis des instruments de musique, c'est pas sûr que ce soit suffisant.

Mais si c'est simplement pour acheter un ordinateur, une interface audio, un micro, un préampli et des enceintes de monitoring, alors oui, 5000 euros suffisent.

Un conseil : il faut que les élements cités ci-dessus soient homogènes dans la chaîne sonore. Inutile d'acheter un super micro très cher pour l'associer à un préampli bas de gamme. Tout doit être dans la même gamme de qualité (ce qui ne veut pas forcément dire dans la même gamme de prix !).

Pour plus de détails, parce que je ne peux pas répondre à tous sur chaque problème particulier, et que ce n'est pas le but de mon site, je vous conseille le site <a href="http://fr.audiofanzine.com/" target="_blanck">Audiofanzine</a>, qui est très complet et dont le forum est une mine d'informations inépuisable.

Grebz</em>



jeff2902
le 19/01/2011 à 19h51

Bonjour,

Je voudrais pouvoir obtenir un son proche de celui de groupes de pop-punk tel que <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GcNiKCmWdYE" target="_blanck">All time Low</a> par exemple, un son assez propre.

J'utilise déjà Guitar Rig 4 et Amplitube mais les sons ne me conviennnent pas. J'ai essayé plusieurs amplis Lepou, mais impossible d'obtenir un son propre. Pourriez vous m'aider svp ? Je vous remercie d'avance.

PS : le MySpace du <a href="http://myspace.com/nastyshades" target="_blanck">groupe dans lequel je joue</a>.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

<em>D'après ce que j'entends, il y a un gros travail d'égalisation pour éviter les recoupements de fréquence, ce qui permet de bien séparer les sonorités des guitares. Je pense aussi qu'ils ont au minimum doublé les prises de guitare pour faire un effet "mur du son". Il y a des guitares partout qui jouent plus ou moins la même chose, on n'a pas un instant de repos.

La caisse claire est très en avant, de même que la voix lead. Juste après, on a les guitares, la basse est plutôt en retrait (en même temps, le bassiste ne fait pas grand-chose d'intéressant, il se contente de suivre les accords) et les cymbales sont assez discrètes aussi.

Il semblerait que le groupe All Time Low utilise des amplis et baffles Mesa, des simus de chez Line 6, et qu'ils font aussi appel à des simulateurs d'amplis et de baffles (comme moi !).

Fais des essais avec des simulations Nick Crow, le NRR1 d'Ignite Amps ou le Lecto de Lepou, en ajoutant un simulateur de baffle avec des impulsions de baffle MESA (je crois qu'il y en a dans celles que je propose).

Grebz</em>



Pioud
le 02/01/2011 à 12h16

Hello Grebz,

Super ton tuto sur la convolution ! Très intéressant !
Merci pour toutes ces informations !
Je vois peut être un axe d'amélioration afin d'obtenir une convolution de bonne qualité :
Lorsque tu relies la sortie de ton interface audio à ton ampli guitare, tu as un problème d'impédance qui n'est pas respecté : il faut je pense utiliser une boite de reamp (inverse d'une DI) afin d'adapter l'impédance.
Voilà, bonne continuation et bonne année !!!

PJ

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

<em>Alors là, je n'en sais rien du tout. Dans les différents tutoriaux que j'ai pu lire ou voir en vidéo (en anglais dans la plupart des cas, c'est pour ça que j'ai décidé d'en faire un en français), je n'ai jamais rien vu qui concerne l'impédance. Ce qui ne veut pas dire que le problème ne se présente pas, d'ailleurs.
Mais je dois dire que je n'ai rien constaté de gênant lors de la création de mes impulsions. N'ayant pas de boîte de reamp, je ne vais pas pouvoir essayer, mais que ceux qui suivent le tuto n'hésitent pas à essayer d'en ajouter une dans la chaîne, histoire de vérifier que ça améliore les choses. Et si c'est le cas, tant mieux ! Tout ce qui peut contribuer à améliorer les techniques est le bienvenu.

Et bonne année à tous, bien entendu ! Bonheur, bonne bouffe et teint hâlé !

Grebz</em>



Brughes
le 27/12/2010 à 11h43

J'ai composé un morceau rythmique. Si cela t'intéresse, je te l'envoie.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

<em>Si vous avez des morceaux, indiquez-moi plutôt un lien où les écouter (myspace, jamendo ou autre...)

Grebz</em>



LaurentB
le 24/12/2010 à 11h41

Bonjour,

J'essaie Sonar X1 depuis quelques jours et je le trouve super, sauf un problème que je n'arrive pas à résoudre : voir mes plugins VST !

J'ai bien entendu précisé le chemin de mes plugins (program files\vstplugins)et la quasi-totalité de mes VST n'est pas visible quand je veux affecter un effet audio à une piste.

J'ai pourtant l'habitude de faire fonctionner des VST dans FL Studio ou Reaper.
Le plus bizarre, c'est que mis à part un ou deux rejetés, Sonar semble les voir lors du scan : je ne comprends pas.

Si vous pouvez m'aider, ça serait sympa.

Merci pour votre site et les impulsions d'ampli à télécharger.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

<em>Si vous utilisez un Sonar 64 bits sur un Windows 64 bits également, il ne faut pas oublier que Windows gère 2 dossiers Program Files différents. Le premier s'appelle "Program Files (x86)" et contient tous les programmes 32 bits. Le second s'appelle "Programmes" (dans la version française, et "Program Files" dans la version anglaise) et contient tous les programmes 64 bits.

Il est tout à fait possible de placer manuellement ses plugins dans l'un ou l'autre des répertoires, mais bien entendu, il faut indiquer à Sonar d'aller chercher dans les deux.

Dans mon cas, mes VST 32 bits sont dans ce répertoire-là :
C:\Program Files (x86)\Cakewalk\Vstplugins
Et mes VST 64 bits sont là :
C:\Programmes\Cakewalk\Vstplugins

Certains VST sont fournis avec un programme d'installation. Il ne faut pas simplement les placer manuellement dans le bon répertoire VST, ils vont s'installer eux-mêmes dans un répertoire spécifique, à moins bien sûr de choisir le répertoire VST lors de l'installation.

Par exemple, le simulateur d'ampli TH1 de Overloud s'installe par défaut dans le répertoire C:\Programmes\Overloud
Il n'est donc pas dans un répertoire VST. Pour que Sonar le voit (j'imagine que c'est pareil dans un autre séquenceur), il faut ajouter ce chemin dans le gestionnaire de plugins de Sonar, sinon il sera introuvable dans la liste des VST disponibles.

Grebz</em>

Top of page